S&T Bancorp, Inc.
S&T BANCORP INC (Form: 10-K, Received: 02/24/2017 06:03:08)
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
x     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
  For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
or
   o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the transition period from                      to                      .
Commission file number 0-12508
S&T BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania
 
25-1434426
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation of organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
 
800 Philadelphia Street, Indiana, PA
 
15701
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (800) 325-2265
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
 
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $2.50 per share
 
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(NASDAQ Global Select Market)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes   x      No   o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes   o     No   x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes   x     No   o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this form 10-K or any amendment to this form 10-K.   o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes   x     No   o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer   x
 
Accelerated filer   o
Non-accelerated filer   o  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company   o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes   o     No   x The aggregate estimated fair value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2016:
Common Stock, $2.50 par value – $ 825,267,183
The number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of February 22, 2017:
Common Stock, $2.50 par value – 34,913,023
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement of S&T Bancorp, Inc., to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A for the 2016 annual meeting of shareholders to be held May 15, 2017 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this annual report on Form 10-K.


Table of Contents

 
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
 
 
 
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
 
 
 
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
 
 
 
Item 15.
 


2

Table of Contents

PART I
 
Item 1.  BUSINESS
General
S&T Bancorp, Inc., was incorporated on March 17, 1983 under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as a bank holding company and is registered with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, or the Federal Reserve Board, under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, or the BHCA, as a bank holding company and a financial holding company. S&T Bancorp, Inc. has three direct wholly-owned subsidiaries, S&T Bank, 9th Street Holdings, Inc. and STBA Capital Trust I, and also owns a 50 percent interest in Commonwealth Trust Credit Life Insurance Company, or CTCLIC. When used in this report, “S&T”, “we”, “us” or “our” may refer to S&T Bancorp, Inc. individually, S&T Bancorp, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, or certain of S&T Bancorp, Inc.’s subsidiaries or affiliates. As of December 31, 2016, we had approximately $6.9 billion in assets, $5.6 billion in loans, $5.3 billion in deposits and $842.0 million in shareholders’ equity.
S&T Bank is a full service bank, providing services to its customers through locations in Pennsylvania, Ohio and New York. On October 29, 2014 we entered into an agreement to acquire Integrity Bancshares, Inc., and the transaction was completed on March 4, 2015. The transaction was valued at $172.0 million and added total assets of $980.8 million, including $788.7 million in loans, $115.9 million in goodwill, and $722.3 million in deposits. Integrity Bank was subsequently merged into S&T Bank on May 8, 2015. S&T Bank operates under the name "Integrity Bank - A division of S&T Bank" in south-central Pennsylvania. S&T Bank deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, to the maximum extent provided by law. S&T Bank has three wholly-owned operating subsidiaries: S&T Insurance Group, LLC, S&T Bancholdings, Inc. and Stewart Capital Advisors, LLC.
We have three reportable operating segments including Community Banking, Wealth Management and Insurance. Our Community Banking segment offers services which include accepting time and demand deposits and originating commercial and consumer loans. The Wealth Management segment offers brokerage services, serves as executor and trustee under wills and deeds and as guardian and custodian of employee benefits and provides other trust services. In addition, it is a registered investment advisor that manages private investment accounts for individuals and institutions. Total Wealth Management assets under management and administration were $1.9 billion at December 31, 2016. The Insurance segment includes a full-service insurance agency offering commercial property and casualty insurance, group life and health coverage, employee benefit solutions and personal insurance lines. Refer to [Note 25 Segments] the financial statements contained in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further details pertaining to our operating segments.
The main office of both S&T Bancorp, Inc. and S&T Bank is located at 800 Philadelphia Street, Indiana, Pennsylvania, and its phone number is [(800) 325-2265].
Employees
As of December 31, 2016, we had 1,080 full-time equivalent employees.
Access to United States Securities and Exchange Commission Filings
All of our reports filed electronically with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, including this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, or the Report, our prior annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and our annual proxy statements, as well as any amendments to those reports, are accessible at no cost on our website at www.stbancorp.com under Financial Information, SEC Filings. These filings are also accessible on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. The charters of the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Benefits Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Executive Committee, the Credit Risk Committee, the Trust and Revenue Oversight Committee, as well as the Complaints Regarding Accounting, Internal Accounting Controls or Auditing Matters Policy, or the Whistleblower Policy, the Code of Conduct for the CEO and CFO, the General Code of Conduct, Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Shareholder Communications Policy are also available at www.stbancorp.com under Corporate Governance.
Supervision and Regulation
General
S&T and S&T Bank are each extensively regulated under federal and state law. Regulation of bank holding companies and banks is intended primarily for the protection of consumers, depositors, borrowers, the Federal Deposit Insurance Fund, or DIF, and the banking system as a whole, and not for the protection of shareholders or creditors. The following describes certain aspects of that regulation and does not purport to be a complete description of all regulations that affect S&T or all aspects of any regulation discussed here. To the extent statutory or regulatory provisions are described, the description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory or regulatory provisions.

3

Table of Contents

Item 1.  BUSINESS -- continued




S&T
We are a bank holding company subject to regulation under the BHCA and the examination and reporting requirements of the Federal Reserve Board. Under the BHCA, a bank holding company may not directly or indirectly acquire ownership or control of more than five percent of the voting shares or substantially all of the assets of any additional bank, or merge or consolidate with another bank holding company, without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board. We have maintained a passive ownership position in Allegheny Valley Bancorp, Inc. (14.1 percent) pursuant to approval from the Federal Reserve Board. On August 29, 2016, Allegheny Valley Bancorp, Inc. and Standard Financial Corp. jointly announced the signing of a definitive merger agreement to form a partnership of their financial institutions. The merger is expected to close in the second quarter of 2017.
As a bank holding company, we are expected under statutory and regulatory provisions to serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to our subsidiary bank. A bank holding company is also expected to commit resources, including capital and other funds, to support its subsidiary bank.
We elected to become a financial holding company under the BHCA in 2001 and thereby engage in a broader range of financial activities than are permissible for traditional bank holding companies. In order to maintain our status as a financial holding company, we must remain “well-capitalized” and “well-managed” and the depository institutions controlled by us must remain “well-capitalized,” “well-managed” (as defined in federal law) and have at least a “satisfactory” Community Reinvestment Act, or CRA, rating. Refer to [Note 24 Regulatory Matters] to the financial statements contained in Part II, Item 8 of this Report for information concerning the current capital ratios of S&T and S&T Bank. No prior regulatory approval is required for a financial holding company with total consolidated assets less than $50 billion to acquire a company, other than a bank or savings association, engaged in activities that are financial in nature or incidental to activities that are financial in nature, as determined by the Federal Reserve Board, unless the total consolidated assets to be acquired exceed $10 billion. The BHCA identifies several activities as “financial in nature” including, among others, securities underwriting; dealing and market making; sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies; insurance underwriting and sales agency; investment advisory activities; merchant banking activities and activities that the Federal Reserve Board has determined to be closely related to banking. Banks may also engage in, subject to limitations on investment, activities that are financial in nature, other than insurance underwriting, insurance company portfolio investment, real estate development and real estate investment, through a financial subsidiary of the bank, if the bank is “well-capitalized,” “well-managed” and has at least a “satisfactory” CRA rating.
If S&T or S&T Bank ceases to be “well-capitalized” or “well-managed,” we will not be in compliance with the requirements of the BHCA regarding financial holding companies or requirements regarding the operation of financial subsidiaries by insured banks.
If a financial holding company is notified by the Federal Reserve Board of such a change in the ratings of any of its subsidiary banks, it must take certain corrective actions within specified time frames. Furthermore, if S&T Bank was to receive a CRA rating of less than “satisfactory,” then we would be prohibited from engaging in certain new activities or acquiring companies engaged in certain financial activities until the rating is raised to “satisfactory” or better.
We are presently engaged in nonbanking activities through the following five entities:
9th Street Holdings, Inc. was formed in June 1988 to hold and manage a group of investments previously owned by S&T Bank and to give us additional latitude to purchase other investments.
S&T Bancholdings, Inc. was formed in August 2002 to hold and manage a group of investments previously owned by S&T Bank and to give us additional latitude to purchase other investments.
CTCLIC is a joint venture with another financial institution, acting as a reinsurer of credit life, accident and health insurance policies that were sold by S&T Bank and the other institution. S&T Bank and the other institution each have ownership interests of 50 percent in CTCLIC.
S&T Insurance Group, LLC distributes life insurance and long-term disability income insurance products. During 2001, S&T Insurance Group, LLC and Attorneys Abstract Company, Inc. entered into an agreement to form S&T Settlement Services, LLC, or STSS, with respective ownership interests of 55 percent and 45 percent. STSS is a title insurance agency servicing commercial customers. During 2002, S&T Insurance Group, LLC expanded into the property and casualty insurance business with the acquisition of S&T-Evergreen Insurance, LLC.
Stewart Capital Advisors, LLC was formed in August 2005 and is a registered investment advisor that manages private investment accounts for individuals and institutions.

4

Table of Contents

Item 1.  BUSINESS -- continued




S&T Bank
As a Pennsylvania-chartered, FDIC-insured non-member commercial bank, S&T Bank is subject to the supervision and regulation of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities, or PADBS, and the FDIC. We are also subject to various requirements and restrictions under federal and state law, including requirements to maintain reserves against deposits, restrictions on the types, amount and terms and conditions of loans that may be granted and limits on the types of other activities in which S&T Bank may engage and the investments it may make. In addition, pursuant to the federal Bank Merger Act, S&T Bank must obtain the prior approval of the FDIC before it can merge or consolidate with or acquire the assets of or assume the deposit liabilities of another bank.
In addition, S&T Bank is subject to affiliate transaction rules in Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act as implemented by the Federal Reserve's Regulation W, that limit the amount of transactions between itself and S&T or any other affiliate which is any company or entity that controls or is under common control with S&T Bank, including for most purposes any financial or depository institution subsidiary of the bank. Under these provisions, transactions, including making loans, purchasing assets, issuing guarantees and other similar transactions, between a bank and its parent company or any other affiliate, generally are limited to 10 percent of the bank subsidiary’s capital and surplus, and with respect to all transactions with affiliates, are limited to 20 percent of the bank subsidiary’s capital and surplus. Loans and extensions of credit from a bank to an affiliate generally are required to be secured by eligible collateral in specified amounts, and in general all affiliated transactions must be on terms consistent with safe and sound banking practices. The Dodd-Frank Act expanded the affiliate transaction rules to broaden the definition of affiliate and to apply to securities borrowing or lending, repurchase or reverse repurchase agreements and derivatives activities that we may have with an affiliate, and to strengthen collateral requirements and limit Federal Reserve exemptive authority.
Federal law also constrains the types and amounts of loans that S&T Bank may make to its executive officers, directors and principal shareholders. Among other things, these loans are limited in amount, must be approved by the bank’s board of directors in advance, and must be on terms and conditions as favorable to the bank as those available to an unrelated person. The Dodd-Frank Act strengthened restrictions on loans to insiders and expanded the types of transactions subject to the various limits to include credit exposure arising from a derivative transaction, a repurchase or reverse repurchase agreement and a securities lending or borrowing transaction.
Insurance of Accounts; Depositor Preference
The deposits of S&T Bank are insured up to applicable limits per insured depositor by the FDIC. The Dodd-Frank Act codified FDIC deposit insurance coverage per separately insured depositor for all account types at $250,000.
As an FDIC-insured bank, S&T Bank is subject to FDIC insurance assessments, which are imposed based upon the calculated risk the institution poses to the Deposit Insurance Fund, or DIF. Under this assessment system, for an institution with less than $10 billion in assets, risk is defined and measured using an institution’s capital levels, supervisory ratings and financial ratios. Assessments are calculated as a percentage of average consolidated total assets less average tangible equity during the assessment period. The current total base assessment rates on an annualized basis range from 1.5 basis points for certain “well-capitalized,” “well-managed” banks, with the highest ratings, to 40 basis points for institutions posing the most risk to the DIF. The FDIC may raise or lower these assessment rates on a quarterly basis based on various factors designed to achieve a minimum designated reserve ratio of the DIF, which the Dodd-Frank Act has mandated to be no less than 1.35 percent of estimated insured deposits, subsequently set at two percent by the FDIC.
In February 2011, the FDIC Board of Directors adopted a final rule, Deposit Insurance Assessment Base, Assessment Rate Adjustments, Dividends, Assessment Rates and Large Bank Pricing Methodology. This final rule redefined the deposit insurance assessment base to equal average consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity as required by the Dodd-Frank Act, altered assessment rates, implemented the Dodd-Frank Act’s DIF dividend provisions and revised the risk-based assessment system for all large insured depository institutions (those with at least $10.0 billion in total assets). Many of the changes were made as a result of provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act that were intended to shift more of the cost of raising the reserve ratio from institutions with less than $10.0 billion in assets, which includes S&T Bank, to larger banks. Except for the future assessment rate schedules, all changes went into effect April 1, 2011 and have resulted in lower FDIC expense.
In July 2016 the FDIC Board of Directors adopted a revised final rule to refine the deposit insurance assessment system for small insured depository institutions that have been federally insured for at least five years by: revising the financial ratios method so that it is based on a statistical model estimating the probability of failure over three years; updating the financial measures used in the financial ratios method consistent with the statistical model; and eliminating risk categories for established small banks and using the financial ratios method to determine assessment rates for all such banks. The amended FDIC insurance assessment benefits many small institutions with a lower rate, we however incurred a minimal increase to our base rate.
In addition to DIF assessments, the FDIC makes a special assessment to fund the repayment of debt obligations of the Financing Corporation, or FICO. FICO is a government-sponsored entity that was formed to borrow the money necessary to

5

Table of Contents

Item 1.  BUSINESS -- continued




carry out the closing and ultimate disposition of failed thrift institutions by the Resolution Trust Corporation in the 1990s. The FICO assessment rate for the first quarter of 2017 is 0.560 basis points on an annualized basis.
The FDIC may terminate the deposit insurance of any insured depository institution if it determines after a hearing that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC or the Federal Reserve Board. It also may suspend deposit insurance temporarily during the hearing process if the institution has no tangible capital. If insurance of accounts is terminated, the accounts at the institution at the time of termination, less subsequent withdrawals, shall continue to be insured for a period of six months to two years, as determined by the FDIC.
Under federal law, deposits and certain claims for administrative expenses and employee compensation against insured depository institutions are afforded a priority over other general unsecured claims against such an institution, including federal funds and letters of credit, in the liquidation or other resolution of such an institution by a receiver. Such priority creditors would include the FDIC.
Capital
The Federal Reserve Board and FDIC have issued substantially similar minimum risk-based and leverage capital rules applicable to banking organizations they supervise. At December 31, 2016, both S&T and S&T Bank met the applicable regulatory capital requirements.
The following table summarizes risk-based capital ratios for S&T and S&T Bank:
 
Actual
 
Minimum
Regulatory Capital
Requirements
 
To be
Well Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions
(dollars in thousands)
Amount

Ratio

 
Amount

Ratio

 
Amount

Ratio

As of December 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Leverage Ratio
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S&T
$
582,155

8.98
%
 
$
259,170

4.00
%
 
$
323,963

5.00
%
S&T Bank
542,048

8.39
%
 
258,460

4.00
%
 
323,075

5.00
%
Common Equity Tier 1 (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S&T
562,155

10.04
%
 
252,079

4.50
%
 
364,114

6.50
%
S&T Bank
542,048

9.71
%
 
251,213

4.50
%
 
362,864

6.50
%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S&T
582,155

10.39
%
 
336,105

6.00
%
 
448,140

8.00
%
S&T Bank
542,048

9.71
%
 
334,951

6.00
%
 
446,601

8.00
%
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S&T
664,184

11.86
%
 
448,140

8.00
%
 
560,175

10.00
%
S&T Bank
622,469

11.15
%
 
446,602

8.00
%
 
558,252

10.00
%
In addition, the banking regulatory agencies may from time to time require that a banking organization maintain capital above the minimum prescribed levels, whether because of its financial condition or actual or anticipated growth.
In July 2013 the federal banking agencies issued final regulatory capital rules that replaced the then existing general risk-based capital and related rules, broadly revising the basic definitions and elements of regulatory capital and making substantial changes to the risk weightings for banking and trading book assets. The new regulatory capital rules are designed to implement Basel III (which were agreements reached in July 2010 by the international oversight body of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision to require more and higher-quality capital) as well as the minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act. The final rules established a comprehensive capital framework, and went into effect on January 1, 2015, for smaller banking organizations such as S&T and S&T Bank. It introduces a minimum common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio requirement of 4.50 percent, increases the minimum Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio to 6.00 percent, and requires a leverage ratio of 4.00 percent for all banks. Common equity Tier 1 capital consists of common stock instruments that meet the eligibility criteria in the rule, retained earnings, accumulated other comprehensive income and common equity Tier 1 minority interest. The rule also requires a banking organization to maintain a capital conservation buffer composed of common equity Tier 1 capital in an amount greater than 2.50 percent of total risk-weighted assets beginning in 2019. Beginning in 2016, the capital conservation buffer is being phased in, beginning at 25 percent, increasing to 50 percent in 2017, 75 percent in 2018 and 100 percent in 2019 and beyond. As a result, starting in 2019, a banking organization must maintain a common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio greater than 7.00 percent, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio greater than 8.50 percent and a Total risk-based capital ratio greater than 10.50 percent; otherwise, it will be subject to restrictions on capital distributions and

6

Table of Contents

Item 1.  BUSINESS -- continued




discretionary bonus payments. By 2019, when the new rule is fully phased in, the minimum capital requirements plus the capital conservation buffer will exceed the regulatory capital ratios required for an insured depository institution to be well-capitalized under prompt corrective action law, described below.
The new regulatory capital rule also revises the calculation of risk-weighted assets. It includes a new framework under which the risk weight will increase for most credit exposures that are 90 days or more past due or on nonaccrual, high-volatility commercial real estate loans and certain equity exposures. It also includes changes to the credit conversion factors of off-balance sheet items, such as the unused portion of a loan commitment.
Federal regulators periodically propose amendments to the regulatory capital rules and the related regulatory framework and consider changes to the capital standards that could significantly increase the amount of capital needed to meet applicable standards. The timing of adoption, ultimate form and effect of any such proposed amendments cannot be predicted.
Payment of Dividends
S&T is a legal entity separate and distinct from its banking and other subsidiaries. A substantial portion of our revenues consist of dividend payments we receive from S&T Bank. S&T Bank, in turn, is subject to federal and state laws and regulations that limit the amount of dividends it can pay to S&T. In addition, both S&T and S&T Bank are subject to various general regulatory policies relating to the payment of dividends, including requirements to maintain adequate capital above regulatory minimums. The Federal Reserve Board has indicated that banking organizations should generally pay dividends only if (i) the organization’s net income available to common shareholders over the past year has been sufficient to fully fund the dividends and (ii) the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. Thus, under certain circumstances based upon our financial condition, our ability to declare and pay quarterly dividends may require consultation with the Federal Reserve Board and may be prohibited by applicable Federal Reserve Board guidance.
Other Safety and Soundness Regulations
There are a number of obligations and restrictions imposed on bank holding companies such as us and our depository institution subsidiary by federal law and regulatory policy. These obligations and restrictions are designed to reduce potential loss exposure to the FDIC’s deposit insurance fund in the event an insured depository institution becomes in danger of default or is in default. Under current federal law, for example, the federal banking agencies possess broad powers to take prompt corrective action to resolve problems of insured depository institutions. The extent of these powers depends upon whether the institution in question is “well-capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” or “critically undercapitalized,” as defined by the law. As of December 31, 2016, S&T Bank was classified as “well-capitalized.” New definitions of these categories, as set forth in the federal banking agencies’ final rule to implement Basel III and the minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act, became effective as of January 1, 2015. To be well-capitalized, an insured depository institution must have a common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.50 percent, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 8.00 percent, a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.00 percent and a leverage ratio of at least 5.00 percent. To be adequately capitalized, an insured depository institution must have a common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 4.50 percent, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.00 percent, a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 8.00 percent and a leverage ratio of at least 4.00 percent. The classification of depository institutions is primarily for the purpose of applying the federal banking agencies’ prompt corrective action provisions and is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as a representation of overall financial condition or prospects of any financial institution.
The federal banking agencies’ prompt corrective action powers, which increase depending upon the degree to which an institution is undercapitalized can include, among other things, requiring an insured depository institution to adopt a capital restoration plan, which cannot be approved unless guaranteed by the institution’s parent company; placing limits on asset growth and restrictions on activities, including restrictions on transactions with affiliates; restricting the interest rates the institution may pay on deposits; prohibiting the payment of principal or interest on subordinated debt; prohibiting the holding company from making capital distributions, including payment of dividends, without prior regulatory approval; and, ultimately, appointing a receiver for the institution. For example, only a “well-capitalized” depository institution may accept brokered deposits without prior regulatory approval.
The federal banking agencies have also adopted guidelines prescribing safety and soundness standards relating to internal controls and information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, fees and compensation and benefits. In general, the guidelines require appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage specified risks and exposures. The guidelines prohibit excessive compensation as an unsafe and unsound practice and characterize compensation as excessive when the amounts paid are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by an executive officer, employee, director or principal shareholder. In addition, the agencies have adopted regulations that authorize, but do not require, an agency to order an institution that has been given notice by an agency that it is not in

7

Table of Contents

Item 1.  BUSINESS -- continued




compliance with any of such safety and soundness standards to submit a compliance plan. If, after being so notified, an institution fails to submit an acceptable compliance plan, the agency must issue an order directing action to correct the deficiency and may issue an order directing other actions of the types to which an “undercapitalized” institution is subject under the prompt corrective action provisions described above.
Regulatory Enforcement Authority
The enforcement powers available to federal banking agencies are substantial and include, among other things and in addition to other powers described herein, the ability to assess civil money penalties and impose other civil and criminal penalties, to issue cease-and-desist or removal orders, to appoint a conservator to conserve the assets of an institution for the benefit of its depositors and creditors and to initiate injunctive actions against banks and bank holding companies and “institution affiliated parties,” as defined in the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of laws and regulations, and engagement in unsafe or unsound practices. Other actions or inactions may provide the basis for enforcement action, including misleading or untimely reports filed with regulatory authorities.
At the state level, the PADBS also has broad enforcement powers over S&T Bank, including the power to impose fines and other penalties and to appoint a conservator or receiver.
Interstate Banking and Branching
The BHCA currently permits bank holding companies from any state to acquire banks and bank holding companies located in any other state, subject to certain conditions, including certain nationwide and state-imposed deposit concentration limits. In addition, because of changes to law made by the Dodd-Frank Act, S&T Bank may now establish de novo branches in any state to the same extent that a bank chartered in that state could establish a branch.
Community Reinvestment, Fair Lending and Consumer Protection Laws
In connection with its lending activities, S&T Bank is subject to a number of state and federal laws designed to protect borrowers and promote lending to various sectors of the economy and population. The federal laws include, among others, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Truth-in-Lending Act, the Truth-in-Savings Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the CRA. In addition, federal rules require disclosure of privacy policies to consumers and, in some circumstances, allow consumers to prevent the disclosure of certain personal information to nonaffiliated third parties.
The CRA requires the appropriate federal banking agency, in connection with its examination of a bank, to assess the bank’s record in meeting the credit needs of the communities served by the bank, including low and moderate-income neighborhoods. Furthermore, such assessment is required of any bank that has applied, among other things, to merge or consolidate with or acquire the assets or assume the liabilities of an insured depository institution, or to open or relocate a branch office. In the case of a bank holding company, including a financial holding company, applying for approval to acquire a bank or bank holding company, the Federal Reserve Board will assess the record of each subsidiary bank of the applicant bank holding company in considering the application. Under the CRA, institutions are assigned a rating of “outstanding,” “satisfactory,” “needs to improve” or “unsatisfactory.” S&T Bank was rated “satisfactory” in its most recent CRA evaluation.
With respect to consumer protection, the Dodd-Frank Act created the CFPB, which took over rulemaking responsibility on July 21, 2011 for the principal federal consumer financial protection laws, such as those identified above. Institutions that have assets of $10.0 billion or less, such as S&T Bank, will continue to be supervised in this area by their state and primary federal regulators, which in the case of S&T Bank is the FDIC. The Dodd-Frank Act also gives the CFPB expanded data collection powers for fair lending purposes for both small business and mortgage loans, as well as expanded authority to prevent unfair, deceptive and abusive practices. The consumer complaint function also has been consolidated into the CFPB with respect to the institutions it supervises. The CFPB established an Office of Community Banks and Credit Unions, with a mission to ensure that the CFPB incorporates the perspectives of small depository institutions into the policy-making process, communicates relevant policy initiatives to community banks and credit unions, and works with community banks and credit unions to identify potential areas for regulatory simplification.
Fair lending laws prohibit discrimination in the provision of banking services, and the enforcement of these laws has been a focus for bank regulators. Fair lending laws include the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act, which outlaw discrimination in credit transactions and residential real estate on the basis of prohibited factors including, among others, race, color, national origin, sex and religion. A lender may be liable for policies that result in a disparate treatment of or have a disparate impact on a protected class of applicants or borrowers. If a pattern or practice of lending discrimination is alleged by a regulator, then that agency may refer the matter to the U.S. Department of Justice, or DOJ, for investigation. In December of 2012, the DOJ and the CFPB entered into a Memorandum of Understanding under which the agencies have agreed to share information, coordinate investigations and have generally committed to strengthen their coordination efforts. S&T Bank is

8

Table of Contents

Item 1.  BUSINESS -- continued




required to have a fair lending program that is of sufficient scope to monitor the inherent fair lending risk of the institution and that appropriately remediates issues which are identified.
In January 2013, the CFPB issued a series of final rules related to mortgage loan origination and mortgage loan servicing. In particular, on January 10, 2013, the CFPB issued a final rule implementing the ability-to-repay and qualified mortgage (QM) provisions of the Truth-in-Lending Act, as amended by the Dodd-Frank Act (“QM Rule”). The ability-to-repay provision requires creditors to make reasonable, good-faith determinations that borrowers are able to repay their mortgage loans before extending the credit based on a number of factors and consideration of financial information about the borrower from reasonably reliable third-party documents. Under the Dodd-Frank Act and the QM Rule, loans meeting the definition of “qualified mortgage” are entitled to a presumption that the lender satisfied the ability-to-repay requirements. The presumption is a conclusive presumption/safe harbor for prime loans meeting the QM requirements, and a rebuttable presumption for higher-priced/subprime loans meeting the QM requirements. The definition of a QM incorporates the statutory requirements, such as not allowing negative amortization or terms longer than 30 years. The QM Rule also adds an explicit maximum 43 percent debt-to-income ratio for borrowers if the loan is to meet the QM definition, though some mortgages that meet government-sponsored enterprise, or GSE, Federal Housing Administration, or FHA, and Veterans Affairs, or VA, underwriting guidelines may, for a period not to exceed seven years, meet the QM definition without being subject to the 43 percent debt-to-income limits. The QM Rule became effective on January 10, 2014. These rules did not have a material impact on our mortgage business.
In November 2013, the CFPB issued a final rule implementing the Dodd-Frank Act requirement to establish integrated disclosures in connection with mortgage origination, which incorporates disclosure requirements under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the Truth-in-Lending Act. The requirements of the final rule apply to all covered mortgage transactions for which S&T Bank receives a consumer application on or after October 3, 2015. CFPB issued a final rule regarding the integrated disclosures in December 2013, and the disclosure requirement became effective in October 2015. These rules did not have a material impact on our mortgage business.
Anti-Money Laundering Rules
S&T Bank is subject to the Bank Secrecy Act, its implementing regulations and other anti-money laundering laws and regulations, including the USA Patriot Act of 2001. Among other things, these laws and regulations require S&T Bank to take steps to prevent the bank from being used to facilitate the flow of illegal or illicit money, to report large currency transactions and to file suspicious activity reports. S&T Bank is also required to develop and implement a comprehensive anti-money laundering compliance program. Banks must also have in place appropriate “know your customer” policies and procedures. Violations of these requirements can result in substantial civil and criminal sanctions. In addition, provisions of the USA Patriot Act of 2001 require the federal financial institution regulatory agencies to consider the effectiveness of a financial institution’s anti-money laundering activities when considering applications for bank mergers and bank holding company acquisitions.
Government Actions and Legislation
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or Dodd-Frank Act, enacted in July 2010, has had and will continue to have a broad impact on the financial services industry, including significant regulatory and compliance changes addressing, among other things: (i) enhanced resolution authority of troubled and failing banks and their holding companies; (ii) increased capital and liquidity requirements; (iii) increased regulatory examination fees; (iv) changes to assessments to be paid to the FDIC for federal deposit insurance; (v) enhanced corporate governance and executive compensation requirements and disclosures; and (vi) numerous other provisions designed to improve supervision and oversight of, and strengthen safety and soundness for, the financial services sector. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank act established a new framework for systemic risk oversight within the financial system to be distributed among new and existing federal regulatory agencies, including the Financial Stability Oversight Council, the Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the FDIC. Many of the requirements called for in the Dodd-Frank Act continue to be implemented, and/or are subject to implementing regulations over the course of several years. Given the uncertainty associated with the manner in which the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act will be implemented by the various regulatory agencies and through regulations, the full extent of the impact such requirements will have on financial institutions’ operations is unclear. The changes resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act may impact the profitability of our business activities, require changes to certain of our business practices, increase our operating and compliance costs, or otherwise adversely affect our business. These changes may also require us to invest significant management attention and resources to evaluate and make necessary changes in order to comply with new statutory and regulatory requirements.

9

Table of Contents

Item 1.  BUSINESS -- continued




In addition, proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the banking industry are frequently raised in Congress, in state legislatures and before the various bank regulatory agencies that may impact S&T. Such initiatives may include proposals to expand or contract the powers of bank holding companies and depository institutions or proposals to substantially change the financial institution regulatory system. Any such legislation could change bank statutes and our operating environment in substantial and unpredictable ways. If enacted, such legislation could affect how S&T and S&T Bank operate and could significantly increase costs, impede the efficiency of internal business processes, limit our ability to pursue business opportunities in an efficient manner, or affect the competitive balance among banks, savings associations, credit unions and other financial institutions, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The likelihood and timing of any changes and the impact such changes might have on S&T or S&T Bank is impossible to determine with any certainty.
In December 2013, federal regulators adopted final regulations regarding the so-called Volcker Rule established in the Dodd-Frank Act. The Volcker Rule generally prohibits banks and their affiliates from engaging in proprietary trading and investing in and sponsoring certain unregistered investment companies generally covering hedge funds and private equity funds, subject to certain exemptions. The rules are complex, and the deadline for a banking entity to conform its activities to the requirements of the rule has been extended to July 21, 2017. However, S&T does not currently anticipate that the Volcker Rule will have a material effect on S&T Bank or its affiliates, because we generally do not engage in the prohibited activities.
In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act provides that the amount of any interchange fee charged for electronic debit transactions by debit card issuers having assets over $10 billion must be reasonable and proportional to the actual cost of a transaction to the issuer. The Federal Reserve Board has adopted a rule which limits the maximum permissible interchange fees that such issuers can receive for an electronic debit transaction. This rule, Regulation II, which was effective October 1, 2011, does not apply to a bank that, together with its affiliates, has less than $10 billion in assets.
Competition
S&T Bank competes with other local, regional and national financial services providers, such as other financial holding companies, commercial banks, savings associations, credit unions, finance companies and brokerage and insurance firms, including competitors that provide their products and services online. Some of our competitors are not subject to the same level of regulation and oversight that is required of banks and bank holding companies, and are thus able to operate under lower cost structures.
Changes in bank regulation, such as changes in the products and services banks can offer and permitted involvement in non-banking activities by bank holding companies, as well as bank mergers and acquisitions, can affect our ability to compete with other financial services providers. Our ability to do so will depend upon how successfully we can respond to the evolving competitive, regulatory, technological and demographic developments affecting our operations.
Our market area includes Pennsylvania and the contiguous states of Ohio, West Virginia, New York and Maryland. The majority of our commercial and consumer loans are made to businesses and individuals in this market area resulting in a geographic concentration. Our market area has a high density of financial institutions, some of which are significantly larger institutions with greater financial resources than us, and many of which are our competitors to varying degrees. Our competition for loans comes principally from commercial banks, savings associations, mortgage banking companies, credit unions and other financial service companies. Our most direct competition for deposits has historically come from commercial banks, savings banks and credit unions. We face additional competition for deposits from non-depository competitors such as the mutual fund industry, securities and brokerage firms and insurance companies. Because larger competitors have advantages in attracting business from larger corporations, we do not generally attempt to compete for that business. Instead, we concentrate our efforts on attracting the business of individuals, and small and medium-size businesses. We consider our competitive advantages to be customer service and responsiveness to customer needs, the convenience of banking offices and hours, access to electronic banking services and the availability and pricing of our products and services. We emphasize personalized banking and the advantage of local decision-making in our banking business.
The financial services industry is likely to become more competitive as further technological advances enable more companies to provide financial services on a more efficient and convenient basis. Technological innovations have lowered traditional barriers to entry and enabled many companies to compete in financial services markets. Many customers now expect a choice of banking options for the delivery of services, including traditional banking offices, telephone, internet, mobile, ATMs, self-service branches, and/or in-store branches. These delivery channels are offered by traditional banks and savings associations, credit unions, brokerage firms, asset management groups, finance and insurance companies, internet-based companies, and mortgage banking firms.

10

Table of Contents

Item 1A.  RISK FACTORS
Investments in our common stock involve risk. The following discussion highlights the risks that we believe are material to S&T, but does not necessarily include all risks that we may face.
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors.
Our quarterly and annual operating results have varied significantly in the past and could vary significantly in the future, which makes it difficult for us to predict our future operating results. Our operating results may fluctuate due to a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control, including the changing U.S. economic environment and changes in the commercial and residential real estate market, any of which may cause our stock price to fluctuate. If our operating results fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, the price of our common stock could decline substantially. Our stock price can fluctuate significantly in response to a variety of factors including, among other things:
volatility of stock market prices and volumes in general;
changes in market valuations of similar companies;
changes in conditions in credit markets;
changes in accounting policies or procedures as required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, or other regulatory agencies;
legislative and regulatory actions, including the impact of the Dodd-Frank Act and related regulations, that may subject us to additional regulatory oversight which may result in increased compliance costs and/or require us to change our business model;
government intervention in the U.S. financial system and the effects of and changes in trade and monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including the interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve;
additions or departures of key members of management;
fluctuations in our quarterly or annual operating results; and
changes in analysts’ estimates of our financial performance.
Risks Related to Credit
Our ability to assess the credit-worthiness of our customers may diminish, which may adversely affect our results of operations.
We incur credit risk by virtue of making loans and extending loan commitments and letters of credit. Our exposure to credit risk is managed through the use of consistent underwriting standards that emphasize “in-market” lending while avoiding highly leveraged transactions as well as excessive industry and other concentrations. Our credit administration function employs risk management techniques to ensure that loans adhere to corporate policy and problem loans are promptly identified. There can be no assurance that such measures will be effective in avoiding undue credit risk. If the models and approaches that we use to select, manage and underwrite our consumer and commercial loan products become less predictive of future charge-offs, due to rapid changes in the economy, including the unemployment rate, our credit losses may increase.
The value of the collateral used to secure our loans may not be sufficient to compensate for the amount of an unpaid loan and we may be unsuccessful in recovering the remaining balance from our customers.
Decreases in real estate values, particularly with respect to our commercial lending and mortgage activities, could adversely affect the value of property used as collateral for our loans and our customers’ ability to repay these loans, which in turn could impact our profitability. Repayment of our commercial loans is often dependent on the cash flow of the borrower, which may become unpredictable. If the value of the assets, such as real estate, serving as collateral for the loan portfolio were to decline materially, a significant part of the loan portfolio could become under-collateralized. If the loans that are secured by real estate become troubled when real estate market conditions are declining or have declined, in the event of foreclosure, we may not be able to realize the amount of collateral that was anticipated at the time of originating the loan. This could result in higher charge-offs which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
Changes in the overall credit quality of our portfolio can have a significant impact on our earnings.
Like other lenders, we face the risk that our customers will not repay their loans. We reserve for losses in our loan portfolio based on our assessment of inherent credit losses. This process, which is critical to our financial results and condition, requires complex judgment including our assessment of economic conditions, which are difficult to predict. Through a periodic review of the loan portfolio, management determines the amount of the allowance for loan loss, or ALL, by considering historical losses combined with qualitative factors including changes in lending policies and practices, economic conditions, changes in the loan portfolio, changes in lending management, results of internal loan reviews, asset quality trends, collateral values,

11

Table of Contents

concentrations of credit risk and other external factors. The amount of future losses is susceptible to changes in economic, operating and other conditions, including changes in interest rates, which may be beyond our control. We may underestimate our inherent losses and fail to hold an ALL sufficient to account for these losses. Incorrect assumptions could lead to material underestimates of inherent losses and an inadequate ALL. As our assessment of inherent losses changes, we may need to increase or decrease our ALL, which could impact our financial results and profitability.
Our loan portfolio is concentrated within our market area, and our lack of geographic diversification increases our risk profile.
The regional economic conditions within our market area affect the demand for our products and services as well as the ability of our customers to repay their loans and the value of the collateral securing these loans. We are less able than a larger institution to spread the risks of unfavorable local economic conditions across a large number of diversified economies. A significant decline in the regional economy caused by inflation, recession, unemployment or other factors could negatively affect our customers, the quality of our loan portfolio and the demand for our products and services. Any sustained period of increased payment delinquencies, foreclosures or losses caused by adverse market or economic conditions in our market area could adversely affect the value of our assets, revenues, results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, we cannot give any assurance that we will benefit from any market growth or favorable economic conditions in our primary market area.
Our loan portfolio has a significant concentration of commercial real estate loans.
The majority of our loans are to commercial borrowers. The commercial real estate, or CRE, segment of our loan portfolio typically involves higher loan principal amounts, and the repayment of these loans is generally dependent, in large part, on sufficient income from the properties securing the loans to cover operating expenses and debt service. Because payments on loans secured by CRE often depend upon the successful operation and management of the properties, repayment of these loans may be affected by factors outside the borrower’s control, including adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. Additionally, we have a number of significant credit exposures to commercial borrowers, and while the majority of these borrowers have numerous projects that make up the total aggregate exposure, if one or more of these borrowers default or have financial difficulties, we could experience higher credit losses, which could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. In December 2015, the FDIC and the other federal financial institution regulatory agencies released a new statement on prudent risk management for commercial real estate lending. In this statement, the agencies express concerns about easing commercial real estate underwriting standards, direct financial institutions to maintain underwriting discipline and exercise risk management practices to identify, measure and monitor lending risks, and indicate that they will continue to pay special attention to commercial real estate lending activities and concentrations going forward.
Risks Related to Our Operations
A failure in or breach of our operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties, could disrupt our businesses, and adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition, as well as cause reputational harm.
Our operational and security systems, infrastructure, including our computer systems, data management, and internal processes, as well as those of third parties, are integral to our business. We rely on our employees and third parties in our day-to-day and ongoing operations, who may, as a result of human error, misconduct, malfeasance, or systems breach, expose us to risk. We have taken measures to implement backup systems and other safeguards to support our operations, but our ability to conduct business may be adversely affected by any significant disruptions to us or to third parties with whom we interact. Our ability to implement backup systems and other safeguards with respect to third-party systems is more limited than with our own systems. Our systems and infrastructure may fail to operate properly or become disabled or damaged as a result of a number of factors including events that are wholly or partially beyond our control. This could adversely affect our ability to process transactions or provide services. There could be sudden increases in customer transaction volume, electrical, telecommunications or other major physical infrastructure outages, natural disasters, events arising from local or larger scale political or social matters, including terrorist acts, and cyber attacks. Operational risk exposures could adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition, and cause reputational harm.
A cyber attack, information or security breach, or a technology failure of ours or of a third party could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition, and cause reputational harm.
Our business is highly dependent on the security of our infrastructure, computer and data management systems, as well as those of third parties with whom we interact. Our operations rely on the secure processing, transmission, storage and retrieval of confidential, proprietary and other information in our data management systems and networks, and in the data management systems and networks of third parties. Financial services institutions have been subject to, and are likely to continue to be the

12

Table of Contents

target of cyber attacks, including computer viruses, malicious or destructive code, phishing attacks, denial of service or information or other security breaches. Cyber attacks could result in the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss or destruction of confidential, proprietary and other information of the institution, its employees or customers or of third parties, or otherwise materially disrupt network access or business operations. As cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities or incidents. Any of the matters could result in our loss of customers and business opportunities and could result in a violation of applicable privacy laws and other laws, litigation exposure, regulatory fines, penalties or intervention, loss of confidence in our security measures, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensatory costs, and additional compliance costs. In addition, any of the matters described above could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.
We rely on third-party providers and other suppliers for a number of services that are important to our business. An interruption or cessation of an important service by any third party could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We are dependent for the majority of our technology, including our core operating system, on third party providers. If these companies were to discontinue providing services to us, we may experience significant disruption to our business. If any of our third party service providers experience financial, operational or technological difficulties, or if there is any other disruption in our relationships with them, we may be required to locate alternative sources of such services. We are dependent on these third-party providers securing their information systems, over which we have no control, and a breach of their information systems could result in the disclosure of sensitive, personal customer information, which could have a material adverse impact on our business through damage to our reputation, loss of customer business, remedial costs, additional regulatory scrutiny or exposure to civil litigation and possible financial liability. Assurance cannot be provided that we could negotiate terms with alternative service sources that are as favorable or could obtain services with similar functionality as found in existing systems without the need to expend substantial resources, if at all, thereby resulting in a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
Risks Related to Interest Rates and Investments
Our net interest income could be negatively affected by interest rate changes which may adversely affect our financial condition.
Our results of operations are largely dependent on net interest income, which is the difference between the interest and fees earned on interest-earning assets and the interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Therefore, any change in general market interest rates, including changes resulting from the Federal Reserve Board’s policies, can have a significant effect on our net interest income and total income. There may be mismatches between the maturity and repricing of our assets and liabilities that could cause the net interest rate spread to compress, depending on the level and type of changes in the interest rate environment. Interest rates could remain at low levels causing spread compression. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control, including general economic conditions and the policies of various governmental agencies. In addition, some of our customers often have the ability to prepay loans or redeem deposits with either no penalties, or penalties that are insufficient to compensate us for the lost income. A significant reduction in our net interest income will adversely affect our business and results of operations. If we are unable to manage interest rate risk effectively, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially harmed.
Declines in the value of investment securities held by us could require write-downs, which would reduce our earnings.
In order to diversify earnings and enhance liquidity, we own both debt and equity instruments of government agencies, municipalities and other companies. We may be required to record impairment charges on our investment securities if they suffer a decline in value that is considered other-than-temporary. Additionally, the value of these investments may fluctuate depending on the interest rate environment, general economic conditions and circumstances specific to the issuer. Volatile market conditions may detrimentally affect the value of these securities, such as through reduced valuations due to the perception of heightened credit or liquidity risks. Changes in the value of these instruments may result in a reduction to earnings and/or capital, which may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Risks Related to Our Business Strategy
Our strategy includes growth plans through organic growth and by means of acquisitions. Our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected if we fail to grow or fail to manage our growth effectively.

13

Table of Contents

We intend to continue pursuing a growth strategy through, organic growth and by means of acquisitions, both within our current footprint and market expansion. We continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities as another source of growth. We cannot give assurance that we will be able to expand our existing market presence, or successfully enter new markets or that any such expansion will not adversely affect our results of operations. Failure to manage our growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, future prospects, financial condition or results of operations and could adversely affect our ability to successfully implement our business strategy.
Our failure to find suitable acquisition candidates, or successfully bid against other competitors for acquisitions, could adversely affect our ability to fully implement our business strategy. If we are successful in acquiring other entities, the process of integrating such entities, will divert significant management time and resources. We may not be able to integrate efficiently or operate profitably any entity we may acquire. We may experience disruption and incur unexpected expenses in integrating acquisitions. These failures could adversely impact our future prospects and results of operation.
We are subject to competition from both banks and non-banking companies.
The financial services industry is highly competitive, and we encounter strong competition for deposits, loans and other financial services in our market area, including online providers of these projects and services. Our principal competitors include commercial banks of all types, finance companies, credit unions, mortgage brokers, insurance agencies, trust companies and various sellers of investments and investment advice. Many of our non-bank competitors are not subject to the same degree of regulation that we are and have advantages over us in providing certain services. Additionally, many of our competitors are significantly larger than we are and have greater access to capital and other resources. Failure to compete effectively for deposit, loan and other financial services customers in our markets could cause us to lose market share, slow our growth rate and have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We may be required to raise capital in the future, but that capital may not be available or may not be on acceptable terms when it is needed.
We are required by federal regulatory authorities to maintain adequate capital levels to support operations. New regulations to implement Basel III and the Dodd-Frank Act require us to have more capital. While we believe we currently have sufficient capital, if we cannot raise additional capital when needed, we may not be able to meet these requirements. In addition, our ability to further expand our operations through organic growth, which includes growth within our current footprint and growth through market expansion, may be adversely affected by any inability to raise necessary capital. Our ability to raise additional capital at any given time is dependent on capital market conditions at that time and on our financial performance and outlook.
Risks Related to Regulatory Compliance and Legal Matters
Recent legislation enacted in response to market and economic conditions may significantly affect our operations, financial condition and earnings.
The Dodd-Frank Act was enacted as a major reform in response to the financial crisis that began in the last decade. The Dodd-Frank Act increases regulation and oversight of the financial services industry, and imposes restrictions on the ability of institutions within the industry to conduct business consistent with historical practices, including aspects such as capital requirements, affiliate transactions, compensation, consumer protection regulations and mortgage regulation, among others. It is not clear what impact the Dodd-Frank Act and the numerous implementing regulations will ultimately have on the financial markets or on the U.S. banking and financial services industries and the broader U.S. and global economies. Such regulations may increase our costs of regulatory compliance and of doing business and otherwise affect our operations, and will likely result in additional costs and a diversion of management’s time from other business activities, any of which may adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition. The regulations also may significantly affect our business strategy, the markets in which we do business, the markets for and value of our investments and our ongoing operations, costs and profitability.
Future governmental regulation and legislation could limit our growth or diminish the value of our business.
We are subject to extensive state and federal regulation, supervision and legislation that govern nearly every aspect of our operations. The regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors, customers and the banking system as a whole, not shareholders. Failure to comply with applicable regulations could lead to penalties and damage to our reputation. Furthermore, as shown through the Dodd-Frank Act, the regulatory environment is constantly undergoing change and the impact of changes to laws, the rapid implementation of regulations, the interpretation of such laws or regulations or other actions by existing or new regulatory agencies could make regulatory compliance more difficult or expensive, and thus could affect our ability to deliver or expand services, or it could diminish the value of our business. The ramifications and uncertainties of the level of government intervention in the U.S. financial system could also adversely affect us.

14

Table of Contents


Negative public opinion could damage our reputation and adversely impact our earnings and liquidity.
Reputational risk, or the risk to our business, earnings, liquidity and capital from negative public opinion, is inherent in our operations. Negative public opinion could result from our actual or alleged conduct in a variety of areas, including legal and regulatory compliance, lending practices, corporate governance, litigation, ethical issues or inadequate protection of customer information. We are dependent on third-party providers for a number of services that are important to our business. Refer to the risk factor titled, “We rely on third-party providers and other suppliers for a number of services that are important to our business. An interruption or cessation of an important service by any third party could have a material adverse effect on our business” for additional information. A failure by any of these third-party service providers could cause a disruption in our operations, which could result in negative public opinion about us or damage to our reputation. We expend significant resources to comply with regulatory requirements, and the failure to comply with such regulations could result in reputational harm or significant legal or remedial costs. Damage to our reputation could adversely affect our ability to retain and attract new customers and employees, expose us to litigation and regulatory action and adversely impact our earnings and liquidity.
We may be a defendant from time to time in a variety of litigation and other actions, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
From time to time, customers and others make claims and take legal action pertaining to the performance of our responsibilities. Whether customer claims and legal action related to the performance of our responsibilities are founded or unfounded, if such claims and legal actions are not resolved in a manner favorable to us, they may result in significant expenses, attention from management and financial liability. Any financial liability or reputational damage could have a material adverse effect on our business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Liquidity
We rely on a stable core deposit base as our primary source of liquidity.
We are dependent for our funding on a stable base of core deposits. Our ability to maintain a stable core deposit base is a function of our financial performance, our reputation and the security provided by FDIC insurance, which combined, gives customers confidence in us. If any of these considerations deteriorates, the stability of our core deposits could be harmed. In addition, deposit levels may be affected by factors such as general interest rate levels, rates paid by competitors, returns available to customers on alternative investments and general economic conditions. Accordingly, we may be required from time to time to rely on other sources of liquidity to meet withdrawal demands or otherwise fund operations.
Our ability to meet contingency funding needs, in the event of a crisis that causes a disruption to our core deposit base, is dependent on access to wholesale markets, including funds provided by the FHLB of Pittsburgh.
We own stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, or FHLB, in order to qualify for membership in the FHLB system, which enables us to borrow on our line of credit with the FHLB that is secured by a blanket lien on a significant portion of our loan portfolio. Changes or disruptions to the FHLB or the FHLB system in general may materially impact our ability to meet short and long-term liquidity needs or meet growth plans. Additionally, we cannot be assured that the FHLB will be able to provide funding to us when needed, nor can we be certain that the FHLB will provide funds specifically to us, should our financial condition and/or our regulators prevent access to our line of credit. The inability to access this source of funds could have a materially adverse effect on our ability to meet our customer’s needs. Our financial flexibility could be severely constrained if we were unable to maintain our access to funding or if adequate financing is not available at acceptable interest rates.
Risks Related to Owning Our Stock
Our outstanding warrant may be dilutive to holders of our common stock.
The ownership interest of the existing holders of our common stock may be diluted to the extent our outstanding warrant is exercised. The warrant will remain outstanding until January 2019. There are 517,012 shares of common stock underlying the warrant, representing approximately 1.46 percent of the shares of our common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2016, including the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrant in total shares outstanding. The warrant holder has the right to vote any of the shares of common stock it receives upon exercise of the warrant.


15

Table of Contents


Our ability to pay dividends on our common stock may be limited.
Holders of our common stock will be entitled to receive only such dividends as our Board of Directors may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. Although we have historically declared cash dividends on our common stock, we are not required to do so and our Board of Directors could reduce, suspend or eliminate our dividend at any time. Any decrease to or elimination of the dividends on our common stock could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Item 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
There are no unresolved SEC staff comments.
Item 2.  PROPERTIES
We own a building in Indiana, Pennsylvania, located at 800 Philadelphia Street, which serves as our headquarters and executive and administrative offices. Our Community Banking and Wealth Management segments are also located at our headquarters. In addition, we own a building in Indiana, Pennsylvania that serves as additional administrative offices. We lease two buildings in Indiana, Pennsylvania: one that houses both our data processing and technology center and one of our branches and one that houses our training center. Community Banking has 66 locations, including 61 branches located in sixteen counties in Pennsylvania, of which 36 are owned and 30 are leased, including the aforementioned building that shares space with our data center. The other three Community Banking locations include one leased loan production office in Ohio, a leased branch located in Ohio, a leased loan production office in western New York. We lease an office to our Insurance segment in Cambria County, Pennsylvania. The Insurance segment has staff located within the Community Banking offices in Indiana, Jefferson, Washington and Westmoreland Counties, Pennsylvania. Wealth Management leases two offices, one in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania and one in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania. Wealth Management also has several staff located within the Community Banking offices to provide their services to our customers. Our operating leases and the one capital lease for Community Banking, Wealth Management and Insurance expire at various dates through the year 2055 and generally include options to renew. Management believes the terms of the various leases are consistent with market standards and were arrived at through arm’s length bargaining. For additional information regarding the lease commitments, refer to Note 10 Premises and Equipment to the financial statements contained in Part II, Item 8 of this report.

Item 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The nature of our business generates a certain amount of litigation which arises in the ordinary course of business. However, in management’s opinion, there are no proceedings pending that we are a party to or our property is subject to that would be material in relation to our financial condition or results of operations. In addition, no material proceedings are pending nor are known to be threatened or contemplated against us by governmental authorities or other parties.

Item 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.

16

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Stock Prices and Dividend Information
Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market System or NASDAQ, under the symbol STBA. The range of sale prices for the years 2016 and 2015 is detailed in the table below and is based upon information obtained from NASDAQ. As of the close of business on January 31, 2017, we had 2,974 shareholders of record. Dividends paid by S&T are primarily provided from S&T Bank’s dividends to S&T. The payment of dividends by S&T Bank to S&T is subject to the restrictions described in Part II, Item 8, Note 6 Dividend and Loan Restrictions of this Report. The cash dividends declared per share are shown below.
 
Price Range of
Common Stock
 
Cash
Dividends
Declared

2016
Low

 
High

 
Fourth quarter
$
25.85

 
$
39.65

 
$
0.20

Third quarter
27.93

 
29.15

 
0.19

Second quarter
23.19

 
24.47

 
0.19

First quarter
25.60

 
26.05

 
0.19

2015
 
 
 
 
 
Fourth quarter
$
29.67

 
$
34.00

 
$
0.19

Third quarter
26.57

 
33.14

 
0.18

Second quarter
25.68

 
30.13

 
0.18

First quarter
27.00

 
30.20

 
0.18

Certain information relating to securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is set forth under the heading Equity Compensation Plan Information Update in Part III, Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

17

Table of Contents

Five-Year Cumulative Total Return
The following chart compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total shareholder return of the NASDAQ Composite Index (1) and NASDAQ Bank Index (2)  assuming a $100 investment in each on December 31, 2011.

STBA-201412_CHARTX24885A01.JPG
 
Period Ending
Index
12/31/2011

 
12/31/2012

 
12/31/2013

 
12/31/2014

 
12/31/2015

 
12/31/2016

S&T Bancorp, Inc.
100.00

 
95.46

 
137.58

 
166.62

 
176.61

 
230.30

NASDAQ Composite
100.00

 
117.74

 
165.00

 
189.42

 
202.89

 
221.04

NASDAQ Bank
100.00

 
118.69

 
168.15

 
176.41

 
192.01

 
264.80

(1) The NASDAQ Composite Index measures all NASDAQ domestic and international based common type stocks listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market.
(2) The NASDAQ Bank Index contains securities of NASDAQ-listed companies classified according to the Industry Classification Benchmark as Banks. These companies include banks providing a broad range of financial services, including retail banking, loans and money transmissions.


18

Table of Contents

Item 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA -- continued


Item 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The tables below summarize selected consolidated financial data as of the dates or for the periods presented and should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part II, Item 7 and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in Part II, Item 8 of this Report.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
December 31,
(dollars in thousands)
2016

 
2015

 
2014

 
2013

 
2012

Total assets
$
6,943,053

 
$
6,318,354

 
$
4,964,686

 
$
4,533,190

 
$
4,526,702

Securities available-for-sale, at fair value
693,487

 
660,963

 
640,273

 
509,425

 
452,266

Loans held for sale
3,793

 
35,321

 
2,970

 
2,136

 
22,499

Portfolio loans, net of unearned income
5,611,419

 
5,027,612

 
3,868,746

 
3,566,199

 
3,346,622

Goodwill
291,670

 
291,764

 
175,820

 
175,820

 
175,733

Total deposits
5,272,377

 
4,876,611

 
3,908,842

 
3,672,308

 
3,638,428

Securities sold under repurchase agreements
50,832

 
62,086

 
30,605

 
33,847

 
62,582

Short-term borrowings
660,000

 
356,000

 
290,000

 
140,000

 
75,000

Long-term borrowings
14,713

 
117,043

 
19,442

 
21,810

 
34,101

Junior subordinated debt securities
45,619

 
45,619

 
45,619

 
45,619

 
90,619

Total shareholders’ equity
841,956

 
792,237

 
608,389

 
571,306

 
537,422

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF NET INCOME
 
Years Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)
2016

 
2015

 
2014

 
2013

 
2012

Interest income
$
227,774

 
$
203,548

 
$
160,523

 
$
153,756

 
$
156,251

Interest expense
24,515

 
15,997

 
12,481

 
14,563

 
21,024

Provision for loan losses
17,965

 
10,388

 
1,715

 
8,311

 
22,815

Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan Losses
185,294

 
177,163

 
146,327

 
130,882

 
112,412

Noninterest income
54,635

 
51,033

 
46,338

 
51,527

 
51,912

Noninterest expense
143,232

 
136,717

 
117,240

 
117,392

 
122,863

Net Income Before Taxes
96,697

 
91,479

 
75,425

 
65,017

 
41,461

Provision for income taxes
25,305

 
24,398

 
17,515

 
14,478

 
7,261

Net Income
$
71,392

 
$
67,081

 
$
57,910

 
$
50,539

 
$
34,200


19

Table of Contents

Item 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA -- continued


SELECTED PER SHARE DATA AND RATIOS
Refer to Explanation of Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part II, Item 7 of this report for a discussion of common tangible book value, common return on average tangible assets, common return on average tangible common equity and the ratio of tangible common equity to tangible assets as non-GAAP financial measures.
 
December 31,
 
2016

 
2015

 
2014

 
2013

 
2012

Per Share Data
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings per common share—basic
$
2.06

 
$
1.98

 
$
1.95

 
$
1.70

 
$
1.18

Earnings per common share—diluted
2.05

 
1.98

 
1.95

 
1.70

 
1.18

Dividends declared per common share
0.77

 
0.73

 
0.68

 
0.61

 
0.60

Dividend payout ratio
37.52
%
 
36.47
%
 
34.89
%
 
35.89
%
 
50.75
%
Common book value
$
24.12

 
$
22.76

 
$
20.42

 
$
19.21

 
$
18.08

Common tangible book value (non-GAAP)
15.67

 
14.26

 
14.46

 
13.22

 
12.32

Profitability Ratios
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common return on average assets
1.08
%
 
1.13
%
 
1.22
%
 
1.12
%
 
0.79
%
Common return on average tangible assets (non-GAAP)
1.15
%
 
1.20
%
 
1.28
%
 
1.19
%
 
0.85
%
Common return on average equity
8.67
%
 
8.94
%
 
9.71
%
 
9.21
%
 
6.62
%
Common return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)
13.71
%
 
14.39
%
 
14.02
%
 
13.94
%
 
10.35
%
Capital Ratios
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common equity/assets
12.13
%
 
12.54
%
 
12.25
%
 
12.60
%
 
11.87
%
Tangible common equity/tangible assets (non-GAAP)
8.23
%
 
8.24
%
 
9.00
%
 
9.03
%
 
8.24
%
Tier 1 leverage ratio
8.98
%
 
8.96
%
 
9.80
%
 
9.75
%
 
9.31
%
Common equity tier 1
10.04
%
 
9.77
%
 
11.81
%
 
11.79
%
 
11.37
%
Risk-based capital—tier 1
10.39
%
 
10.15
%
 
12.34
%
 
12.37
%
 
11.98
%
Risk-based capital—total
11.86
%
 
11.60
%
 
14.27
%
 
14.36
%
 
15.39
%
Asset Quality Ratios
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nonaccrual loans/loans
0.76
%
 
0.70
%
 
0.32
%
 
0.63
%
 
1.63
%
Nonperforming assets/loans plus OREO
0.77
%
 
0.71
%
 
0.33
%
 
0.64
%
 
1.66
%
Allowance for loan losses/total portfolio loans
0.94
%
 
0.96
%
 
1.24
%
 
1.30
%
 
1.38
%
Allowance for loan losses/nonperforming loans
124
%
 
136
%
 
385
%
 
206
%
 
85
%
Net loan charge-offs/average loans
0.25
%
 
0.22
%
 
0.00
%
 
0.25
%
 
0.78
%

20

Table of Contents

Item 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA -- continued


RECONCILIATIONS OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP RATIOS
 
December 31
(dollars in thousands)
2016

 
2015

 
2014

 
2013

 
2012

Common tangible book value (non-GAAP)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total shareholders' equity
$
841,956

 
$
792,237

 
$
608,389

 
571,306

 
$
537,422

Less: goodwill and other intangible assets
(296,580
)
 
(298,289
)
 
(178,451
)
 
(179,580
)
 
(181,083
)
Tax effect of other intangible assets
1,719

 
2,284

 
921

 
1,316

 
1,872

Tangible common equity (non-GAAP)
547,095

 
496,232

 
430,859

 
393,042

 
358,211

Common shares outstanding
34,913

 
34,810

 
29,796

 
29,734

 
29,084

Common tangible book value (non-GAAP)
$
15.67

 
$
14.26

 
$
14.46

 
$
13.22

 
$
12.32

Common return on average tangible assets (non-GAAP)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
$
71,392

 
$
67,081

 
$
57,910

 
$
50,539

 
$
34,200

Plus: amortization of intangibles
1,615

 
1,818

 
1,129

 
1,590

 
1,709

Tax effect of amortization of intangibles
(565
)
 
(636
)
 
(395
)
 
(556
)
 
(598
)
Net income before amortization of intangibles
72,442

 
68,263

 
58,644

 
51,573

 
35,311

Total average assets (GAAP Basis)
6,588,255

 
5,942,098

 
4,762,363

 
4,505,792

 
4,312,538

Less: average goodwill and average other intangible assets
(297,377
)
 
(278,130
)
 
(178,990
)
 
(180,338
)
 
(177,511
)
Tax effect of average other intangible assets
1,992

 
2,283

 
1,109

 
1,581

 
2,010

Tangible average assets (non-GAAP)
$
6,292,870

 
$
5,666,251

 
$
4,584,482

 
$
4,327,035

 
$
4,137,037

Common return on average tangible assets (non-GAAP)
1.15
%
 
1.20
%
 
1.28
%
 
1.19
%
 
0.85
%
Common return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
$
71,392

 
$
67,081

 
$
57,910

 
$
50,539

 
$
34,200

Plus: amortization of intangibles
1,615

 
1,818

 
1,129

 
1,590

 
1,709

Tax effect of amortization of intangibles
(565
)
 
(636
)
 
(395
)
 
(556
)
 
(598
)
Net income before amortization of intangibles
72,442

 
68,263

 
58,644

 
51,573

 
35,311

Total average shareholders’ equity (GAAP Basis)
823,607

 
750,069

 
596,155

 
548,771

 
516,812

Less: average goodwill and average other intangible assets
(297,377
)
 
(278,130
)
 
(178,990
)
 
(180,338
)
 
(177,511
)
Tax effect of other intangible assets
1,992

 
2,283

 
1,109

 
1,581

 
2,010

Tangible average common equity (non-GAAP)
$
528,222

 
$
474,222

 
$
418,274

 
$
370,014

 
$
341,311

Common return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)
13.71
%
 
14.39
%
 
14.02
%
 
13.94
%
 
10.35
%
Tangible common equity/tangible assets (non-GAAP)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total shareholders' equity (GAAP basis)
$
841,956

 
$
792,237

 
$
608,389

 
$
571,306

 
$
537,422

Less: goodwill and other intangible assets
(296,580
)
 
(298,289
)
 
(178,451
)
 
(179,580
)
 
(181,083
)
Tax effect of other intangible assets
1,719

 
2,284

 
921

 
1,316

 
1,872

Tangible common equity (non-GAAP)
547,095

 
496,232

 
430,859

 
393,042

 
358,211

Total assets (GAAP basis)
6,943,053

 
6,318,354

 
4,964,686

 
4,533,190

 
4,526,702

Less: goodwill and other intangible assets
(296,580
)
 
(298,289
)
 
(178,451
)
 
(179,580
)
 
(181,083
)
Tax effect of other intangible assets
1,719

 
2,284

 
921

 
1,316

 
1,872

Tangible assets (non-GAAP)
$
6,648,192

 
$
6,022,349

 
$
4,787,156

 
$
4,354,926

 
$
4,347,491

Tangible common equity/tangible assets (non-GAAP)
8.23
%
 
8.24
%
 
9.00
%
 
9.03
%
 
8.24
%
Item 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This section reviews our financial condition for each of the past two years and results of operations for each of the past three years. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior periods to place them on a basis comparable with the current period presentation. Some tables may include additional time periods to illustrate trends within our Consolidated Financial Statements. The results of operations reported in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in future periods.

21

Table of Contents

Item 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS -- continued


Important Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains or incorporates statements that we believe are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements generally relate to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, outlook for earnings, revenues, expenses, capital and liquidity levels and ratios, asset levels, asset quality, financial position, and other matters regarding or affecting S&T and its future business and operations. Forward looking statements are typically identified by words or phrases such as “will likely result,” “expect”, “anticipate,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “project,” “intend”, “ believe”, “assume”, “strategy”, “trend”, “plan”, “outlook”, “outcome”, “continue”, “remain”, “potential,” “opportunity”, “believe”, “comfortable”, “current”, “position”, “maintain”, “sustain”, “seek”, “achieve” and variations of such words and similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as will, would, should, could or may. Although we believe the assumptions upon which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of these assumptions could prove to be inaccurate and the forward-looking statements based on these assumptions could be incorrect. The matters discussed in these forward-looking statements are subject to various risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results and trends to differ materially from those made, projected, or implied in or by the forward-looking statements depending on a variety of uncertainties or other factors including, but not limited to: credit losses, cyber-security concerns; rapid technological developments and changes; sensitivity to the interest rate environment including a prolonged period of low interest rates, a rapid increase in interest rates or a change in the shape of the yield curve; a change in spreads on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; regulatory supervision and oversight; legislation affecting the financial services industry as a whole, and S&T, in particular; the outcome of pending and future litigation and governmental proceedings; increasing price and product/service competition; the ability to continue to introduce competitive new products and services on a timely, cost-effective basis; managing our internal growth and acquisitions; the possibility that the anticipated benefits from acquisitions cannot be fully realized in a timely manner or at all, or that integrating the acquired operations will be more difficult, disruptive or costly than anticipated; containing costs and expenses; reliance on significant customer relationships; general economic or business conditions; deterioration of the housing market and reduced demand for mortgages; deterioration in the overall macroeconomic conditions or the state of the banking industry that could warrant further analysis of the carrying value of goodwill and could result in an adjustment to its carrying value resulting in a non-cash charge to net income; re-emergence of turbulence in significant portions of the global financial and real estate markets that could impact our performance, both directly, by affecting our revenues and the value of our assets and liabilities, and indirectly, by affecting the economy generally and access to capital in the amounts, at the times and on the terms required to support our future businesses. Many of these factors, as well as other factors, are described elsewhere in this report, including Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors and any of our subsequent filings with the SEC. Forward-looking statements are based on beliefs and assumptions using information available at the time the statements are made. We caution you not to unduly rely on forward-looking statements because the assumptions, beliefs, expectations and projections about future events may, and often do, differ materially from actual results. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as to the date on which it is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect developments occurring after the statement is made. 
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes. These estimates, assumptions and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the Consolidated Financial Statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions and judgments. Certain policies are based to a greater extent on estimates, assumptions and judgments of management and, as such, have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported.
Our most significant accounting policies are presented in Part II, Item 8, Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in this Report. These policies, along with the disclosures presented in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the Consolidated Financial Statements and how those values are determined.
We view critical accounting policies to be those which are highly dependent on subjective or complex estimates, assumptions and judgments and where changes in those estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements. We currently view the determination of the allowance for loan losses, or ALL, income taxes, securities valuation and goodwill and other intangible assets to be critical accounting policies. During 2016, we did not significantly change the manner in which we applied our critical accounting policies or developed related assumptions or estimates. We have reviewed these critical accounting estimates and related disclosures with the Audit Committee.

22

Table of Contents

Item 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS -- continued


Allowance for Loan Losses
Our loan portfolio is our largest category of assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have designed a systematic ALL methodology which is used to determine our provision for loan losses and ALL on a quarterly basis. The ALL represents management’s estimate of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date and is presented as a reserve against loans in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The ALL is increased by a provision charged to expense and reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Determination of an adequate ALL is inherently subjective and may be subject to significant changes from period to period.
The methodology for determining the ALL has two main components: evaluation and impairment tests of individual loans and evaluation and impairment tests of certain groups of homogeneous loans with similar risk characteristics.
We individually evaluate all substandard and nonaccrual commercial loans greater than $0.5 million for impairment. A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the original contractual terms of the loan agreement. For all troubled debt restructurings, or TDRs, regardless of size, as well as all other impaired loans, we conduct further analysis to determine the probable loss and assign a specific reserve to the loan if deemed appropriate. Specific reserves are established based upon the following three impairment methods: 1) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, 2) the loan’s observable market price or 3) the estimated fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. These analyses involve a high degree of judgment in estimating the amount of loss associated with specific impaired loans, including estimating the amount and timing of future cash flows, the current estimated fair value of the loan and collateral values. Our impairment evaluations consist primarily of the fair value of collateral method because most of our loans are collateral dependent. We obtain appraisals annually on impaired loans greater than $0.5 million.
The ALL methodology for groups of homogeneous loans, or the reserve for loans collectively evaluated for impairment, is comprised of both a quantitative and qualitative analysis. We first apply historical loss rates to pools of loans, with similar risk characteristics, using a migration analysis where losses in each pool are aggregated over the loss emergence period, or LEP. The LEP is an estimate of the average amount of time from when an event happens that causes the borrower to be unable to pay on a loan until the loss is confirmed through a loan charge-off.
In conjunction with our annual review of the ALL assumptions, we have updated our analysis of LEPs for our Commercial and Consumer loan portfolio segments using our loan charge-off history. The analysis showed that the LEP for our Commercial Real Estate, or CRE, and Commercial and Industrial, or C&I portfolios, have shortened and the LEP for our Commercial Construction portfolio segment has lengthened. We estimate the LEP to be 3 years for CRE and 4 years for construction compared to 3.5 years for both in the prior year and 1.25 years for C&I compared to 2.5 years in the prior year. Our analysis showed an LEP for Consumer Real Estate of 2.75 years compared to 3.5 years in the prior year and Other Consumer of 1.25 years which is consistent with the prior year.
Another key assumption is the look-back period, or LBP, which represents the historical data period utilized to calculate loss rates. During 2016, we lengthened the LBP for all Commercial and Consumer portfolio segments in order to capture relevant historical data believed to be reflective of losses inherent in the portfolios. We used 7.5 years for our LBP for all portfolio segments which encompasses our loss experience during the Financial Crisis, and our more recent improved loss experience. This compared to a LBP of 6.5 years in the prior year. The changes made to the ALL assumptions were applied prospectively and did not result in a material change to the total ALL.
After consideration of the historic loss calculations, management applies additional qualitative adjustments so that the ALL is reflective of the inherent losses that exist in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. Qualitative adjustments are made based upon changes in lending policies and practices, economic conditions, changes in the loan portfolio, changes in lending management, results of internal loan reviews, asset quality trends, collateral values, concentrations of credit risk and other external factors. The evaluation of the various components of the ALL requires considerable judgment in order to estimate inherent loss exposures.
Acquired loans are recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition with no carryover of the related ALL. Determining the fair value of acquired loans involves estimating the principal and interest cash flows expected to be collected on the loans and discounting those cash flows at a market rate of interest. In estimating the fair value of our acquired loans, we considered a number of factors including the loan term, internal risk rating, delinquency status, prepayment rates, recovery periods, estimated value of the underlying collateral and the current interest rate environment.
Loans acquired with evidence of credit deterioration were evaluated and not considered to be significant. The premium or discount estimated through the loan fair value calculation is recognized into interest income on a level yield or straight-line basis over the remaining contractual life of the loans. Additional credit deterioration on acquired loans, in excess of the original credit discount embedded in the fair value determination on the date of acquisition, will be recognized in the ALL through the provision for loan losses.
Our ALL Committee meets quarterly to verify the overall adequacy of the ALL. Additionally, on an annual basis, the ALL Committee meets to validate our ALL methodology. This validation includes reviewing the loan segmentation, LEP, LBP and

23

Table of Contents

Item 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS -- continued


the qualitative framework. As a result of this ongoing monitoring process, we may make changes to our ALL to be responsive to the economic environment.
Although we believe our process for determining the ALL adequately considers all of the factors that would likely result in credit losses, the process includes subjective elements and may be susceptible to significant change. To the extent actual losses are higher than management estimates, additional provisions for loan losses could be required and could adversely affect our earnings or financial position in future periods.
Income Taxes
We estimate income tax expense based on amounts expected to be owed to the tax jurisdictions where we conduct business. The laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by us and various taxing authorities. On a quarterly basis, we assess the reasonableness of our effective tax rate based upon our current estimate of the amount and components of pre-tax income, tax credits and the applicable statutory tax rates expected for the full year.
We determine deferred income tax assets and liabilities using the asset and liability method, and we report them in other assets or other liabilities, as appropriate, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities and recognizes enacted changes in tax rate and laws. When deferred tax assets are recognized, they are subject to a valuation allowance based on management’s judgment as to whether realization is more likely than not.
Accrued taxes represent the net estimated amount due to taxing jurisdictions and are reported in other assets or other liabilities, as appropriate, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We evaluate and assess the relative risks and appropriate tax treatment of transactions and filing positions after considering statutes, regulations, judicial precedent and other information and maintain tax accruals consistent with the evaluation of these relative risks and merits. Changes to the estimate of accrued taxes occur periodically due to changes in tax rates, interpretations of tax laws, the status of examinations being conducted by taxing authorities and changes to statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance. These changes, when they occur, can affect deferred taxes and accrued taxes, as well as the current period’s income tax expense and can be significant to our operating results.
Tax positions are recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded.
Securities Valuation
We determine the appropriate classification of securities at the time of purchase. All securities, including both debt and equity securities, are classified as available-for-sale. These securities are carried at fair value, with net unrealized gains and losses deemed to be temporary and are reported separately as a component of other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. We obtain fair values for debt securities from a third-party pricing service which utilizes several sources for valuing fixed-income securities. We validate prices received from our pricing service through comparison to a secondary pricing service and broker quotes. We review the methodologies of the pricing service which provides us with a sufficient understanding of the valuation models, assumptions, inputs and pricing to reasonably measure the fair value of our debt securities. Realized gains and losses on the sale of available-for-sale securities and other-than-temporary impairment, or OTTI, charges are recorded within noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Net Income. Realized gains and losses on the sale of securities are determined using the specific-identification method.
We perform a quarterly review of our securities to identify those that may indicate an OTTI. Our policy for OTTI within the marketable equity securities portfolio generally requires an impairment charge when the security is in a loss position for 12 consecutive months, unless facts and circumstances would suggest the need for an OTTI prior to that time. Our policy for OTTI within the debt securities portfolio is based upon a number of factors, including but not limited to, the length of time and extent to which the estimated fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition of the underlying issuer, the ability of the issuer to meet contractual obligations, the likelihood of the security’s ability to recover any decline in its estimated fair value and whether we intend to sell the investment security or if it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security prior to the security’s recovery. If the impairment is considered other-than-temporary based on management’s review, the impairment must be separated into credit and non-credit portions. The credit component is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Net Income and the non-credit component is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable taxes. If the financial markets experience deterioration, charges to income could occur in future periods.

24

Table of Contents

Item 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS -- continued


Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
As a result of acquisitions, we have recorded goodwill and identifiable intangible assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired. We account for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting.
We have three reporting units: Community Banking, Insurance and Wealth Management. Existing goodwill relates to value inherent in the Community Banking and Insurance reporting units and that value is dependent upon our ability to provide quality, cost-effective services in the face of competition from other market participants. This ability relies upon continuing investments in processing systems, the development of value-added service features and the ease of use of our services. As such, goodwill value is supported ultimately by profitability that is driven by the volume of business transacted. A decline in earnings as a result of a lack of growth or the inability to deliver cost-effective services over sustained periods can lead to impairment of goodwill, which could adversely impact our earnings in future periods.
The carrying value of goodwill is tested annually for impairment each October 1st or more frequently if it is determined that a triggering event has occurred. We first assess qualitatively whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Our qualitative assessment considers such factors as macroeconomic conditions, market conditions specifically related to the banking industry, our overall financial performance and various other factors. If we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than the carrying amount, we proceed to test for impairment. The evaluation for impairment involves comparing the current estimated fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the current estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, no additional testing is required and an impairment loss is not recorded. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value, further valuation procedures are performed that could result in impairment of goodwill being recorded. Further valuation procedures would include allocating the estimated fair value to all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit to determine an implied goodwill value. If the implied value of goodwill of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. We completed the annual goodwill impairment assessment as required in 2016, 2015 and 2014; the results indicated that the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded the carrying value.
Based upon our qualitative assessment performed for our annual impairment analysis, we concluded that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units exceeds the carrying value. Both the national economy and the local economies in our markets have shown improvement over the past couple of years. General economic activity and key indicators such as housing and unemployment continue to show improvement. While still challenging, the banking environment continues to improve with better asset quality, improved earnings and generally better stock prices. Activity in mergers and acquisitions demonstrated that there is premium value on banking franchises and a number of banks of our size have been able to access the capital markets over the past year. Our stock traded above book value for substantially all of 2016. Additionally, our overall performance remains strong, and we have not identified any other facts or circumstances that would cause us to conclude that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each of the reporting units would be less than the carrying value of the reporting unit.
We determine the amount of identifiable intangible assets based upon independent core deposit and insurance contract valuations at the time of acquisition. Intangible assets with finite useful lives, consisting primarily of core deposit and customer list intangibles, are amortized using straight-line or accelerated methods over their estimated weighted average useful lives, ranging from 10 to 20 years. Intangible assets with finite useful lives are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. No such events or changes in circumstances occurred during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
The financial services industry and securities markets can be adversely affected by declining values. If economic conditions result in a prolonged period of economic weakness in the future, our business segments, including the Community Banking segment, may be adversely affected. In the event that we determine that either our goodwill or finite lived intangible assets are impaired, recognition of an impairment charge could have a significant adverse impact on our financial position or results of operations in the period in which the impairment occurs.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Developments
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, which is included in Part II, Item 8 of this Report, discusses new accounting pronouncements that we have adopted and the expected impact of accounting pronouncements recently issued or proposed, but not yet required to be adopted.
Executive Overview
We are a bank holding company headquartered in Indiana, Pennsylvania with assets of $6.9 billion at December 31, 2016. We operate locations in Pennsylvania, Ohio and New York. We provide a full range of financial services with retail and

25

Table of Contents

Item 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS -- continued


commercial banking products, cash management services, insurance services and trust and brokerage services. Our common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “STBA.”
We earn revenue primarily from interest on loans and securities and fees charged for financial services provided to our customers. Offsetting these revenues are the cost of deposits and other funding sources, provision for loan losses and other operating costs such as salaries and employee benefits, data processing, occupancy and tax expense.
Our mission is to become the financial services provider of choice within the markets that we serve. We strive to do this by delivering exceptional service and value, one customer at a time. Our strategic plan focuses on organic growth, which includes growth within our current footprint and growth through market expansion. We also actively evaluate acquisition opportunities as another source of growth. Our strategic plan includes a collaborative model that combines expertise from all of our business segments and focuses on satisfying each customer’s individual financial objectives.
Our major accomplishments during 2016 included:
We had record net income for 2016 of $71.4 million, or $2.05 per diluted share, compared to $67.1 million, or $1.98 per diluted share for 2015. Return on average assets was 1.08 percent and return on average equity was 8.67 percent for 2016.
During 2016, we successfully executed on our organic growth strategy in both our core footprint and our newer markets. On November 16, 2016, we expanded our commercial banking operations by opening a new facility on the North Shore in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. We had strong organic loan growth of $583.8 million, or 11.6 percent, during 2016.
We grew our deposits $395.8 million, or 8.1 percent, during 2016.
We relocated our banking facility in Akron, Ohio on December 1, 2016, enhancing our presence in Northeast Ohio. The new facility will offer commercial, business and consumer banking, as well as treasury management and private banking services.
Our focus continues to be on loan and deposit growth and implementing opportunities to increase fee income while closely monitoring our operating expenses and asset quality. With our expansion into new markets, we are focused on executing our strategy to successfully build our brand and grow our business in these markets. The low interest rate environment remains a challenge for our net interest income, but we expect that our organic growth will help to mitigate the impact.
Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2016
Earnings Summary
Net income increased $4.3 million, or 6.4 percent, to $71.4 million, or $2.05 per diluted share, in 2016 compared to $67.1 million, or $1.98 per diluted share, in 2015. The timing of the Integrity merger, or Merger, on March 4, 2015 has impacted the comparability of financial results for the full year December 31, 2016 and the full year December 31, 2015 due to only ten months of Integrity results and merger related expenses being included in earnings in 2015. The increase in net income was primarily due to increases in net interest income of $15.7 million, or 8.4 percent, and noninterest income of $3.6 million, or 7.1 percent, partially offset by increases in our provision for loan losses of $7.6 million and noninterest expenses of $6.5 million. Noninterest expense included $3.2 million of merger related expenses during 2015 and no Merger related expenses during the year ended December 31, 2016.
Net interest income increased $15.7 million, or 8.4 percent, to $203.3 million compared to $187.6 million in 2015. The increase was primarily due to the increase in average interest-earning assets of $634 million, or 11.7 percent, partially offset by an increase in average interest-bearing liabilities of $505 million, or 12.8 percent, compared to 2015. The increases in average interest-earning assets related to our successful efforts in growing the loan portfolio organically during 2016. Our loan portfolio increased $632.4 million, or 13.5 percent, during 2016. The increases in average interest-bearing liabilities in 2016 were mainly due to successful deposit growth initiatives. Our deposits increased $396 million, or 8.1 percent. Net interest income was impacted by accretion resulting from purchase accounting fair value adjustments related to the Merger of $3.0 million for 2016 compared to $6.2 million for 2015. Net interest margin, on a fully taxable-equivalent, or FTE, basis, decreased nine basis points to 3.47 percent in 2016 compared to 3.56 percent for 2015.
The provision for loan losses increased $7.6 million to $18.0 million during 2016 compared to $10.4 million in 2015. The higher provision for loan losses was due to an increase in net loan charge-offs and loan growth. Net loan charge-offs were $13.3 million, or 0.25 percent of average loans for 2016 compared to $10.2 million, or 0.22 percent of average loans in 2015.
Total noninterest income increased $3.6 million, or 7.1 percent, to $54.6 million for 2016 compared to $51.0 million for 2015. The increase in noninterest income was primarily due to a gain of $2.1 million on the sale of our credit card portfolio in 2016 and a curtailment gain of $1.0 million resulting from the amendment to freeze benefit accruals for all participants in our defined benefit plans during the first quarter of 2016.

26

Table of Contents

Item 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS -- continued


Total noninterest expense increased $6.5 million to $143.2 million for 2016 compared to $136.7 million for 2015. Salaries and employee benefits increased $9.1 million during 2016 primarily due to annual merit increases, additional employees, medical costs and stock incentive expense. This was offset by no merger expenses in 2016 compared to $3.2 million of merger expenses in 2015.
The provision for income taxes increased $0.9 million to $25.3 million compared to $24.4 million in 2015. The increase was primarily due to a $5.2 million increase in pretax income.
Net Interest Income
Our principal source of revenue is net interest income. Net interest income represents the difference between the interest and fees earned on interest-earning assets and the interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is affected by changes in the average balance of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and changes in interest rates and spreads. The level and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities is managed by our Asset and Liability Committee, or ALCO, in order to mitigate interest rate and liquidity risks of the balance sheet. A variety of ALCO strategies were implemented, within prescribed ALCO risk parameters, to produce what we believe is an acceptable level of net interest income.
The interest income on interest-earning assets and the net interest margin are presented on a FTE basis. The FTE basis adjusts for the tax benefit of income on certain tax-exempt loans and securities using the federal statutory tax rate of 35 percent for each period and the dividend-received deduction for equity securities. We believe this to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest income that provides a relevant comparison between taxable and non-taxable sources of interest income.
The following table reconciles interest income per the Consolidated Statements of Net Income to net interest income and rates adjusted to a FTE basis for the periods presented:
 
Years Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)
2016

 
2015

 
2014

Total interest income
$
227,774

 
$
203,549

 
$
160,523

Total interest expense
24,515

 
15,998

 
12,481

Net interest income per consolidated statements of net income
203,259

 
187,551

 
148,042

Adjustment to FTE basis
7,043

 
6,123

 
5,461

Net Interest Income (FTE) (non-GAAP)
$
210,302

 
$
193,674

 
$
153,503

Net interest margin
3.35
%
 
3.45
%
 
3.38
%
Adjustment to FTE basis
0.12

 
0.11

 
0.12

Net Interest Margin (FTE) (non-GAAP)
3.47
%
 
3.56
%
 
3.50
%

27

Table of Contents

Item 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS -- continued


Average Balance Sheet and Net Interest Income Analysis
The following table provides information regarding the average balances, interest and rates earned on interest-earning assets and the average balances, interest and rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities for the years ended December 31:
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
(dollars in thousands)
Average
Balance

 
Interest

 
Rate

 
Average
Balance

 
Interest

 
Rate

 
Average
Balance

 
Interest

 
Rate

ASSETS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans (1)(2)  
$
5,324,834

 
$
217,225

 
4.08
%
 
$
4,692,433

 
$
191,860

 
4.09
%
 
$
3,707,808

 
$
150,531

 
4.06
%
Interest-bearing deposits with banks
41,810

 
207

 
0.50
%
 
66,101

 
165

 
0.25
%
 
93,645

 
234

 
0.25
%
Taxable investment securities (3)
543,348

 
10,679

 
1.97
%
 
516,335

 
10,162

 
1.97
%
 
442,513

 
8,803

 
1.99
%
Tax-exempt investment
securities (2)
133,348

 
5,627

 
4.22
%
 
138,321

 
6,084

 
4.40
%
 
128,750

 
5,933

 
4.61
%
Federal Home Loan Bank and other restricted stock
23,811

 
1,079

 
4.53
%
 
19,672

 
1,401

 
7.12
%
 
14,083

 
483

 
3.43
%
Total Interest-earning Assets
6,067,151

 
234,817

 
3.87
%
 
5,432,862

 
209,672

 
3.86
%
 
4,386,799

 
165,984

 
3.78
%
Noninterest-earning assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and due from banks
54,715

 
 
 
 
 
56,655

 
 
 
 
 
50,255

 
 
 
 
Premises and equipment, net
47,472

 
 
 
 
 
46,794

 
 
 
 
 
36,115

 
 
 
 
Other assets
471,582

 
 
 
 
 
455,244

 
 
 
 
 
337,205

 
 
 
 
Less allowance for loan losses
(52,665
)
 
 
 
 
 
(49,457
)
 
 
 
 
 
(48,011
)
 
 
 
 
Total Assets
$
6,588,255

 
 
 
 
 
$
5,942,098

 
 
 
 
 
$
4,762,363

 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing demand
$
638,461

 
$
1,029

 
0.16
%
 
$
592,301

 
$
770

 
0.13
%
 
$
321,907

 
$
70

 
0.02
%
Money market
506,440

 
1,910

 
0.38
%
 
388,172

 
724

 
0.19
%
 
321,294

 
507

 
0.16
%
Savings
1,039,664

 
2,002

 
0.19
%
 
1,072,683

 
1,712

 
0.16
%
 
1,033,482

 
1,607

 
0.16
%
Certificates of deposit
1,351,413

 
12,732

 
0.94
%
 
1,093,564

 
8,439

 
0.77
%
 
905,346

 
7,165

 
0.79
%
Brokered deposits
362,576

 
2,020

 
0.56
%
 
376,095

 
1,299

 
0.35
%
 
226,169

 
780

 
0.34
%
Total Interest-bearing deposits
3,898,554

 
19,693

 
0.51
%
 
3,522,815

 
12,944

 
0.37
%
 
2,808,198

 
10,129

 
0.36
%
Securities sold under repurchase agreements
51,021

 
5

 
0.01
%
 
44,394

 
4

 
0.01
%
 
28,372

 
2

 
0.01
%
Short-term borrowings
414,426

 
2,713

 
0.65
%
 
257,117

 
932

 
0.36
%
 
164,811

 
511

 
0.31
%
Long-term borrowings
50,256

 
670

 
1.33
%
 
83,648

 
790

 
0.94
%
 
20,571

 
617

 
3.00
%
Junior subordinated debt securities
45,619

 
1,434

 
3.14
%
 
47,071

 
1,328

 
2.82
%
 
45,619

 
1,222

 
2.68
%
Total Interest-bearing Liabilities
4,459,876

 
24,515

 
0.55
%
 
3,955,045

 
15,998

 
0.40
%
 
3,067,571

 
12,481

 
0.41
%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noninterest-bearing demand
1,232,633

 
 
 
 
 
1,170,011

 
 
 
 
 
1,046,606

 
 
 
 
Other liabilities
72,139

 
 
 
 
 
66,973

 
 
 
 
 
52,031

 
 
 
 
Shareholders’ equity
823,607

 
 
 
 
 
750,069

 
 
 
 
 
596,155

 
 
 
 
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
$
6,588,255

 
 
 
 
 
$
5,942,098

 
 
 
 
 
$
4,762,363

 
 
 
 
Net Interest Income (2)(3)
 
 
$
210,302

 
 
 
 
 
$
193,674

 
 
 
 
 
$
153,503

 
 
Net Interest Margin (2)(3)
 
 
 
 
3.47
%
 
 
 
 
 
3.56
%
 
 
 
 
 
3.50
%
(1) Nonaccruing loans are included in the daily average loan amounts outstanding.
(2) Tax-exempt income is on a FTE basis using the statutory federal corporate income tax rate of 35 percent for 2016, 2015 and 2014.
(3) Taxable investment income is adjusted for the dividend-received deduction for equity securities.

28

Table of Contents

Item 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS -- continued


The following table sets forth for the periods presented a summary of the changes in interest earned and interest paid resulting from changes in volume and changes in rates:
(dollars in thousands)
2016 Compared to 2015
Increase (Decrease) Due to
 
2015 Compared to 2014
Increase (Decrease) Due to
Volume (4)

 
Rate (4)

 
Net

 
Volume (4)

 
Rate (4)

 
Net

Interest earned on:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans (1)(2)
$
25,857

 
$
(492
)
 
$
25,365

 
$
39,974

 
$
1,355

 
$
41,329

Interest-bearing deposits with bank
(61
)
 
103

 
42

 
(69
)
 

 
(69
)
Taxable investment securities (3)
532

 
(15
)
 
517

 
1,468

 
(109
)
 
1,359

Tax-exempt investment securities (2)
(219
)
 
(237
)
 
(456
)
 
441

 
(290
)
 
151

Federal Home Loan Bank and other restricted stock
295

 
(618
)
 
(323
)
 
192

 
726

 
918

Total Interest-earning Assets
26,404

 
(1,259
)
 
25,145

 
42,006

 
1,682

 
43,688

Interest paid on:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing demand
$
60

 
$
198

 
$
258

 
$
59

 
$
641

 
$
700

Money market
221

 
965

 
1,186

 
105

 
112

 
217

Savings
(53
)
 
343

 
290

 
61

 
44

 
105

Certificates of deposit
1,990

 
2,304

 
4,294

 
1,489

 
(215
)
 
1,274

Brokered deposits
(47
)
 
767

 
720

 
517

 
2

 
519

Securities sold under repurchase agreements
1

 

 
1

 
2

 

 
2

Short-term borrowings
570

 
1,211

 
1,781

 
287

 
134

 
421

Long-term borrowings
(315
)
 
196

 
(119
)
 
1,893

 
(1,720
)
 
173

Junior subordinated debt securities
(41
)
 
148

 
107

 
39

 
67

 
106

Total Interest-bearing Liabilities
2,386

 
6,132

 
8,518

 
4,452

 
(935
)
 
3,517

Net Change in Net Interest Income
$
24,018

 
$
(7,391
)
 
$
16,627

 
$
37,554

 
$
2,617

 
$
40,171

(1) Nonaccruing loans are included in the daily average loan amounts outstanding.
(2) Tax-exempt income is on a FTE basis using the statutory federal corporate income tax rate of 35 percent for 2016, 2015 and 2014.
(3) Taxable investment income is adjusted for the dividend-received deduction for equity securities.
(4) Changes to rate/volume are allocated to both rate and volume on a proportionate dollar basis.
Net interest income on a FTE basis increased $16.6 million, or 8.6 percent, compared to 2015. This increase was primarily due to strong organic loan growth during 2016. Net interest income was unfavorably impacted by a decrease in accretion of purchase accounting fair value adjustments of $3.2 million compared to 2015. The net interest margin on a FTE basis decreased nine basis points to 3.47 percent compared to 3.56 percent for 2015. The decrease was primarily due to higher cost liabilities combined with a five basis point decline due to the decrease in accretion of purchase accounting fair value adjustments.
Interest income on a FTE basis increased $25.1 million, or 12.0 percent, compared to 2015. The increase is primarily due to an increase in average interest-earning assets. Average interest-earning assets increased $634.3 million primarily due to an increase in average loan balances from organic loan growth and the Merger. Average loan balances increased $632.4 million and rates earned on loans decreased one basis point compared to 2015. Interest income was unfavorably impacted by a decrease in loan purchase accounting fair value adjustments of $2.6 million compared to 2015. Average interest-bearing deposits with banks, which is primarily cash at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, or Federal Reserve, decreased $24.3 million while average total investment securities increased $22.0 million. The significant decrease in the rate for Federal Home Loan Bank, or FHLB, and other restricted stock is primarily due to a special dividend received of $0.3 million in the first quarter of 2015. Overall, the FTE rate on interest-earning assets increased one basis point compared to 2015.
Interest expense increased $8.5 million to $24.5 million compared to $16.0 million in 2015. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased $504.8 million primarily due to an increase in average interest-bearing deposits resulting from both organic deposit growth and the Merger. Average interest-bearing deposits increased $375.7 million and rates paid on deposits increased 14 basis points compared to 2015. The increase in interest-bearing deposits was primarily due to an increase of $118.3 million in money market accounts and an increase of $257.8 million in certificates of deposit accounts, due to sales efforts and rate promotions offered during 2016. The rate on money market accounts increased 19 basis points and the rate on certificate of deposits increased 17 basis points. Interest expense was unfavorably impacted by a decrease in certificate of deposit purchase accounting fair value adjustments of $0.7 million compared to 2015. Average short-term borrowings increased $157.3 million and average long-term borrowings decreased $33.4 million. This is mainly due to a $100 million long-term variable rate borrowing that was funded in the second quarter of 2015 and matured in the second quarter of 2016. Overall, the cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased by 15 basis points compared to 2015.

29

Table of Contents

Item 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS -- continued


Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses is the amount to be added to the ALL after net loan charge-offs have been deducted to bring the ALL to a level determined to be adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The provision for loan losses increased $7.6 million to $18.0 million for 2016 compared to $10.4 million for 2015. This increase in the provision for loan losses is primarily related to an increase in net loan charge-offs, specific reserves on impaired loans and loan growth compared to the prior year.
Net charge-offs increased $3.1 million to $13.3 million, or 0.25 percent of average loans in 2016, compared to $10.2 million, or 0.22 percent of average loans in 2015. Specific reserves for impaired loans increased $0.8 million from the prior year, due to one C&I loan requiring a specific reserve of $0.8 million. Total nonperforming loans increased to $42.6 million, or 0.76 percent of total loans at December 31, 2016, compared to $35.4 million, or 0.70 percent of total loans at December 31, 2015. The increase in nonperforming loans was primarily due to additional deterioration of acquired loans, subsequent to the acquisition date. Special mention and substandard commercial loans increased $2.2 million to $185.7 million from $183.5 million at December 31, 2015.
The ALL at December 31, 2016, was $52.8 million, or 0.94 percent of total portfolio loans, compared to $48.1 million, or 0.96 percent of total portfolio loans at December 31, 2015. The decrease in the level of the reserve as a percentage to total portfolio loans is partly due to strong loan growth of $583.8 million, or 11.6 percent, during 2016. Refer to the Allowance for Loan Losses section of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, or MD&A, for further details.
Noninterest Income
 
Years Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)
2016

 
2015

 
$ Change

 
% Change

Securities gains, net
$

 
$
(34
)
 
$
34

 
NM

Service charges on deposit accounts
12,512

 
11,642

 
870

 
7.5
 %
Debit and credit card fees
11,943

 
12,113

 
(170
)
 
(1.4
)%
Wealth management fees
10,456

 
11,444

 
(988
)
 
(8.6
)%
Insurance fees
5,253

 
5,500

 
(247
)
 
(4.5
)%
Mortgage banking
2,879

 
2,554

 
325

 
12.7
 %
Gain on sale of credit card portfolio
2,066

 

 
2,066

 
NM

Other Income:

 
 
 

 
 
BOLI income
2,122

 
2,221

 
(99
)
 
(4.5
)%
Letter of credit origination fees
1,154

 
1,242

 
(88
)
 
(7.1
)%
Curtailment gain
1,017

 

 
1,017

 
NM

Interest rate swap fees
977

 
577

 
400

 
69.3
 %
Other
4,256

 
3,774

 
482

 
12.8
 %
Total Other Noninterest Income
9,526

 
7,814

 
1,712

 
21.9
 %
Total Noninterest Income
$
54,635

 
$
51,033

 
$
3,602

 
7.1
 %
NM- percentage not meaningful
Noninterest income increased $3.6 million, or 7.1 percent, in 2016 compared to 2015, primarily due to a $2.1 million gain on the sale of our credit card portfolio and a $1.0 million defined benefit plan curtailment gain. Subsequent to the sale of the credit card portfolio, we will continue to earn credit card related income based on the terms of a marketing agreement with the purchaser, which provides incentives for new credit card accounts and a percentage of both interchange income and finance charges. The defined benefit plan curtailment gain was due to an amendment to freeze benefit accruals under the qualified and nonqualified defined benefit pension plans effective March 31, 2016.
Service charges on deposit accounts increased $0.9 million due to program changes and growth from the Merger. Interest rate swap fees from our commercial customers increased $0.4 million compared to the prior year due to an increase in customer demand for this product. Mortgage banking income increased $0.3 million in 2016 compared to 2015 due to an increase in the volume of loans originated for sale in the secondary market and more favorable pricing on loan sales.
The decrease in wealth management fees of $1.0 million is primarily due to a decrease in our brokerage services revenue compared to the prior year.

30

Table of Contents

Item 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS -- continued


Noninterest Expense
<